Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Comments page 1 of 1
Highest Rank
heart102271 said 11-06-2011 @8:52AM
What a crock. When you put a title on a piece that says "(fill in blank with desirable item) under $100" people are expecting to see a selection of said items in varying price ranges that might make it affordable for nearly everyone. But almost ALL of your selections are in the 80-90$ range, the high end of under $100....and to include a selection that is literally priced at 99.95 is just ridiculous.
replyHighest Rank
Realist said 11-06-2011 @9:59AM
These don't look like wide calf boots at all. The only places I've found to get boots with a wide calf are plus size catalogs. They also come in a variety of widths. They are never under $100 but a good pair of comfortable boots will last for years.
replyNeutral
Mikki said 11-06-2011 @2:23PM
looks more like a lot of the high end fashion styles, not something comfortable for everyday wear to work. And they don't look like wide calf styles either. Fashion designers only truly design for those women who are 6 fett tall and weigh 100 lbs and wear size zero, whico to me is NOT a size, and size two. I want a decent pair of books to wear in ice, snow and slush, not something to wear to impress people. This is another one of those 'bait and switch' articles as far as I am concerned. Must be a slow news day for AOL
replyNeutral
Jim said 11-06-2011 @2:48PM
No boots do you any good on ice